Audits drafted from your systems. Signed by accredited professionals.

Eviqly drafts your recurring compliance audits from the systems where the answers already exist, routes every gap to its owner, and delivers a report reviewed and signed by an AAP-accredited professional.

SOC 2 Type I
Nacha Operating Rules
AAP signed
Read-only access
6-year retention
Immutable trail

What makes Eviqly stand out

Source-backed, every time

Each answer names the report it came from, the policy it cites, and the date it was pulled. Nothing is asserted without a source you can open.

A name on the work

A U.S.-based, AAP-accredited professional reviews the evidence behind each confirmed answer and signs the report under their own accreditation.

Gaps go to an owner

Anything the data can't support becomes a punch-list item routed to the person who can close it. Every confirmation is logged with who and when.

Access on your terms

Authenticate once with read-only, revocable access — or skip integrations entirely and upload documents. Every read is logged. Nothing is ever written back.

What can Eviqly do for you?

Draft the audit

Audit responses are generated from the systems and documents where the answers already exist — with sources attached from the first line.

Confirm with your team

Your owners confirm each answer and close each gap. Who confirmed what, and when, is written into an append-only record.

Sign and retain

An accredited reviewer signs the report and completion statement. Both are retained with their evidence trail for six years.

Feel the simplicity

Unlike a traditional engagement, you don't need six weeks of spreadsheets to get started. Connect read-only, upload what you already keep, or answer a short questionnaire — and let Eviqly draft from there. Most clients use a mix of all three.

Inputs: Connect Upload Answer

No silent guesses. Zero. Nada.

We're dead serious about this one: Eviqly never fills a blank. If the evidence cannot support an answer, the response is marked unsupported, the reason is stated — a missing period, a policy without thresholds, a log that doesn't tie to the review window — and it becomes a gap with an owner.

We don't just claim traceability, either: every draft, confirmation, and signature is written to an immutable, append-only trail (learn more).

The workflow

Four steps, one signed deliverable.

Each stage is recorded. The finished report shows the whole chain, from source to signature.

1

Connect

Authenticate once with read-only access to your existing systems, or upload documents and answer a short set of questions instead.

2

Draft

Eviqly pre-drafts each audit response and attaches its sources. Where the data cannot support an answer, it says so and explains why.

3

Confirm

Your team works through the punch list. Missing items are routed to the right owner, and every confirmation is logged.

4

Review & sign

A U.S.-based, AAP-accredited professional reviews the evidence behind each answer and signs the final report.

4recorded steps, source to signature
1accredited signature on every report
0write access to your systems, ever
6yrsreports and certificates retained

Source-backed answers

Every answer shows its work.

A response is only as good as the evidence behind it. Each drafted answer carries the report it was taken from, the policy it cites, and the date the data was pulled — and when the evidence is not there, Eviqly tells you rather than guessing.

Requirement 2.3 · Are ACH Originators subject to annual risk exposure limit reviews?
Yes. Exposure limits for all 142 active Originators were reviewed on 14 March 2026 by the ACH Risk Committee, per section 4.2 of the ACH Risk Management Policy.
ACH Risk Committee minutes · Q1 2026ACH Risk Management Policy v3.1 §4.2Pulled 02 Jun 2026
Confirmed by Treasury OpsReviewed · AAP
Requirement 5.1 · Is WEB debit account validation performed for first-use accounts?
Cannot be supported from available data. The validation vendor log covers 1 Jan – 30 Apr 2026 only; May–June entries are missing, so completeness for the review period cannot be shown.
Gap · routed to Payments Engineering
  • Upload current ACH Risk Management PolicyCompliance
  • Confirm Originator exposure review dateTreasury Ops
  • Provide May–June account validation logsPayments Eng.
  • Attest to return-rate monitoring thresholdsRisk

Gaps become a punch list

Gaps become tasks with owners.

Instead of a vague "we need more information", each gap is a specific task with an owner. Your team confirms it, the confirmation is recorded, and the audit moves forward.

The deliverable

One deliverable. The whole chain behind it.

What you receive is not a PDF that summarizes conclusions. It is the audit itself, with everything a sponsor bank, examiner, or internal auditor would ask for already attached.

  • Signed audit report and completion statement — participant type, SEC codes, period reviewed
  • Evidence index: every source report, policy citation, and pull date, cross-referenced to its requirement
  • Confirmation record: who confirmed each answer, and when
  • Gap log: what was missing, who it was routed to, how and when it closed
  • Reviewer attestation with accreditation details

Security & access

Read-only. Revocable. Recorded.

Security you can verify — the same standard we test you against.

Authenticate once, read-only

Integrations are scoped to the engagement and never carry write permissions. Revoke access at any time from your own console.

SOC 2 Type I

Aligned with enterprise security expectations. The report is available under NDA for vendor due diligence.

No integration required

Prefer not to connect? Uploads and a structured questionnaire support the full audit with the same source tracking.

Immutable trailappend-only · nothing overwritten
09:14EviqlyDrafted Req. 2.3 from Risk Committee minutes Q1 2026drafted
11:02Treasury OpsConfirmed Req. 2.3 — no editsconfirmed
11:05EviqlyFlagged Req. 5.1 unsupported — May–June logs missinggap
Day 6Payments Eng.Provided validation logs 1 May – 30 Jun; Req. 5.1 → supportedclosed
Day 21AAP reviewerReviewed evidence for 41 requirements; signed completion statementsigned

Year after year

The second audit starts from a confirmed baseline.

Because evidence, confirmations, and closures are retained, next year's cycle begins from this year's confirmed state. Only what changed needs fresh evidence — which is why the recurring audit gets faster, not heavier.

Questions

Frequently asked

Is this software or a service?

A service, built on our own audit-first workflow. You engage Eviqly to perform the audit; an accredited professional reviews and signs the result.

What if the data can't answer?

The item is marked unsupported with a stated reason and becomes a gap with an owner. Eviqly never fills a blank with a guess.

How long does it take?

A first engagement typically runs around four weeks; later cycles start from the confirmed baseline and are usually faster.

All questions and answers

Ready for your next audit cycle?

Tell us your participant type and the standards you need to complete. We'll scope the engagement and show you what your first draft would look like.

Request a scoping call